3-15-19 Turetsky

Finished Folder 8, and Box 1 with it.

Today Mary told me that after further consideration, I shouldn't try to chronologically rearrange Larsen's original order. Would it be a good idea to leave a note about the order in the folder's description?

"The Chief Chemawa Annual" seems to be some kind of yearly sports report, but each year's report (and even the different pages within a year's report) are all titled slightly differently. What I'm wondering is whether I ought to pick one format with which to title them all in the metadata.

For example: the 1937 'Chief Annual' is three pages and alternately titled, "The Chief Chemawa Annual 1937," "The Chief Annual 1937," and "1937 The Chief Annual." The 1938 one is also three pages: "1938 Annual," "The 1938 Chief Chemawa Annual," and "1938 Chief Annual."

So I could just use the exact name of each page in the metadata like this...
   The Chief Chemawa Annual 1937 - box1folder8athletic0227tif
   The Chief Annual 1937, p. 2          - box1folder8athletic0227.tif
   1937 The Chief Annual, p. 3          - box1folder8athletic0227.tif

But I feel like one name format would be cleaner. Thoughts on this? And if I should use one, which format?

I'm pretty sure that all the "Vol. x No. x" documents are sports articles that Larsen has excerpted from the Chemawa American. Should I label their source format as "newspapers" or "clippings (information artifacts)"?